Arrival as Annihilation

On the Structures That Only Survive Your Absence

Topographical chest illustration by Taylor Allyn, 2025.

“The body recognizes wholeness as foreign tissue and begins rejection.”
— Clinical note on transplant compatibility studies, 1987

Preface

There comes a point in every life when you realize the distance you have been tending so carefully never belonged to you. It was inherited, passed down like an heirloom wrapped in old stories: easy to believe, easier to carry, easier still to confuse for truth. You learn to live with it the way people live with a draft in an aging house, certain the cold means someone is missing when, in fact, it is only a door you forgot to close.

This is how forgetting begins, not with rupture but with drift. Awareness steps away from itself with the silence of a hand withdrawing from water, leaving behind a faint hollowness you name as longing for another because you do not yet know how to name longing for yourself. It is an ancient pattern, learned before language, passed down through generations who had to thin their own presence to survive.

But one day, the distance flickers. The light shifts. Something warm stirs beneath the ribs, and the warmth feels like dying. You sense that the one you have been waiting for may not be approaching from the world outside but rising from within. Not a stranger or lost love, but a forgotten self that terrifies you more than any absence ever could.

This is the doorway the fable opens: where belonging becomes inward, where return becomes annihilation, where the self you have been missing demands a price you are not sure you can pay.

What follows is the record of that return—the drift, the vigil, the threshold, the cost, the inheritance. A journey not toward someone else, but toward the self that refused to vanish, even when vanishing was the only way you knew how to survive.

The distance was never ours.

But the return will cost us everything we built in its name.

The Drift

December 2025 arrives like the second year of a chronic illness. The shock has worn off, the emergency protocols have calcified into routine, and everyone has learned to perform wellness while their actual selves starve in rooms no one visits.

We are one year past the election that confirmed what we already knew: this country prefers its cruelty organized. One year of performing resilience while the policies roll out, the rights retract, the violence compounds. One year of strategic meetings and mutual aid networks and carefully worded statements. One year of being useful, being visible, being everything except whole.

The drift is not an accident. It is policy.

Capitalism needs you fragmented—present enough to produce, absent enough not to demand. White supremacy needs you monitoring yourself so thoroughly that external surveillance becomes redundant. Patriarchy needs you performing the acceptable version so convincingly that the true version withers from neglect. Digital platforms need you curating your presence into content, your pain into engagement, your body into data points that track what you want before you know you want it.

The drift is not a personal failing. It is the intended outcome of systems designed to keep you watching the threshold instead of crossing it.

You feel it in your body before you can name it: the way your throat closes before speaking truth in meetings. The way your shoulders climb toward your ears when someone asks what you really think. The way your chest goes hollow when you choose productivity over presence.

You are sitting across from someone you claim to love, watching your mouth form sentences you do not mean. Your voice carries the clean edge of performance—agreeable, measured, present enough to pass inspection but not present enough to be found. They do not notice. Why would they? You have perfected this particular absence long before you met them. More importantly: they need your absence. Their comfort depends on it. The relationship you built together only works because you are not fully there.

This is the first truth you cannot yet face: some of what you call love only functions at a distance.

The drift does not begin as departure. It begins as survival, then becomes architecture, then becomes the only way certain structures can stand.

Your presence thins. Your attention moves through the day with a gentleness that seems harmless, yet something essential lingers a step behind, unfollowed. You speak, but not from the center. You feel, but at an angle you can tolerate. You move, but not fully.

You come from people who had to step away from themselves to endure the world. Your elders knew how to make themselves smaller in dangerous spaces without appearing to shrink, how to monitor every exit while maintaining composure, how to calculate threat before it announced itself. They taught you this without naming it, the way all essential knowledge moves between bodies: through demonstration, through survival, through the architecture of vigilance they built into your nervous system before you had language for what you were learning.

But here is what they could not teach you—what no one who survives through drift can teach: how to recognize when the threat has changed shape. When the danger is no longer outside but inside. When the thing you most need protection from is the protection itself.

By the time you understood the full weight of what you carried, the drift was installed. Each wound, each warning, each calculated exit strategy added another layer of remove until you were operating from so far inside yourself that presence became theoretical. You moved through your life like a tenant in your own body, keeping everything tidy, disturbing nothing, waiting for permission to fully arrive.

And then you built a life around that distance. A career that rewards your ability to analyze systems without feeling them. Friendships that require your listening but not your truth. A politic that needs your labor but not your wholeness. A family that prefers your performance to your presence. A love that only works when you are not completely there.

Sitting across from someone you claim to love, you feel the drift like cold water in your chest. You are there but not there. Speaking but not heard. Seen but not known. And the worst part—the part that makes your hands go numb—is realizing you prefer it this way. The distance feels like control. The performance feels like protection.

But underneath that preference, something older stirs. Something that feels less like return and more like the death of everything you know. A question you have been running from for so long you forgot you were running:

What if the drift is not just survival strategy but active resistance to the truth wholeness demands—that everything you built while broken will have to be destroyed?

The ache begins where the drift begins: not in the world’s refusal of you, but in your refusal of yourself. And deeper than that—in your terror of what accepting yourself would cost.

---

The Vigil

There is a kind of waiting that settles into you so fully it becomes indistinguishable from living. This is the vigil. Not hope, not devotion, just a posture the body learned early, a way of keeping watch for something unnamed.

You imagine you are waiting for someone. You picture their return. You shape your longing into a silhouette the world never confirms.

You keep the lamp lit, believing light will summon what absence has already claimed.

But the lamp is not a beacon. It is a barricade.

You sense something missing but cannot yet admit that the missing is internal. So you cast the ache outward. You wait at a doorway as if the world owes you an arrival, as if someone else’s return will repair a fracture that began in you. You cycle through relationships like stations on a train you never intended to exit. Each one promises what the last failed to deliver: recognition, belonging, the sweet relief of being known.

But you bring the drift with you every time. The same careful distance. The same performance of presence. The same moment when you feel them reaching for the part of you already hidden, and the same quiet withdrawal when they get too close.

Here is what you tell yourself: they were wrong for you. Too demanding, too needy, too unable to hold space for your complexity. They could not see you. They did not deserve you. You are better off alone.

Here is what you cannot yet admit: you needed them to fail you. Being seen would have required being there. And you were not ready.

You are still not ready.

The vigil becomes its own kind of life. You learn to live in the waiting. You call it discernment, selectiveness, protecting your peace. You tell yourself you are healing, growing, learning what you deserve. And maybe you are. But you are also performing the most sophisticated form of abandonment: convincing yourself that absence is a boundary, that drift is self-preservation, that the vigil is devotion instead of what it actually is—punishment disguised as patience.

This is the second illusion: that someone else can return you to yourself.

But here is the deeper illusion beneath that one: that you want to be returned at all.

Because what you have not yet admitted—what the vigil exists to avoid admitting—is that some part of you prefers the waiting to the arrival. Prefers the performance to the presence. Prefers the ache to the integration because the ache is familiar and integration is annihilation.

The world gives you fresh reasons every day. December 2025 closes its fist around the throat of everything you thought might survive. The policies compound. The rights evaporate. The violence becomes routine. Your people are calculating how much of themselves they can abandon and still call it living.

You watch them drift. You drift with them. You call it solidarity.

Your body knows the difference—the exhaustion that comes from performing resilience feels nothing like the exhaustion that comes from actual rest.

But underneath the strategy, underneath the mutual aid networks and the protest signs and the carefully worded statements, something else is happening. You are using the crisis as permission. Permission to stay fragmented. Permission to delay the reckoning. Permission to keep the lamp lit for someone who will never arrive because arriving would mean facing the truth: the drift is not just what they did to you. It is what you have continued doing to yourself.

Over time, the vigil takes on a kind of holiness. The light becomes ritual. The silence becomes prayer. The absence becomes an identity you cannot imagine living without.

Yet beneath that ritual, something shifts.

The air warms. The glow changes shape. A faint stirring begins at the sternum—the same warmth that traced the drift now rising with intention.

And the warmth feels like dying.

It is not a signal of someone approaching the threshold. It is the body’s final warning: cross or calcify. Return or disappear completely. The vigil is ending, not because someone has arrived, but because you are running out of time to choose yourself before the choice is taken from you.

---

The Threshold

The threshold reveals itself not in vision, but in terror.

A warmth gathers at the sternum—steady, insistent, unmistakable. But unlike every spiritual memoir you have ever read, unlike every self-help book that promised return would feel like coming home, this warmth does not comfort. It burns.

You are alone when it happens. An ordinary morning in December, the year exhausted, the country calcified in its cruelty, your people scattered across a landscape of survival strategies that all amount to the same thing: stay small, stay useful, stay alive. You are sitting at your desk trying to write something that matters, trying to produce meaning from a body that feels like it is dissolving.

And then: warmth.

You stop. Put your hands on your chest. Feel it spread through your ribs, your shoulders, the base of your throat. Your breath catches. Your vision narrows. Time does not collapse into sensation—it shatters. Minutes feel like drowning. The warmth builds and builds and you realize with absolute clarity: this is not return. This is the death of everything you built while broken.

The body always knows the way back first. But the body also knows what crossing costs.

This warmth is not new. It is returning. And in its return, it illuminates everything you constructed in its absence: the friendships that only work because you never ask for more. The family that only tolerates you at a distance. The work that only values you for what you produce, not what you are. The love that only functions when you are performing. The politic that needs your labor but not your presence. The self you have been showing the world for so long that you almost forgot it was performance.

As the warmth rises, the doorway you watched so faithfully begins to blur. The lamp’s light no longer spills outward; it gathers inward, illuminating the contours of a presence that has been waiting in the room all along. A presence you misinterpreted as loss.

This is the threshold: the border where the part of you that fled meets the part that remained, where forgetting collides with recognition, where illusion releases its grip and truth steps into view.

And the truth is this: crossing means losing. Not gaining wholeness. Losing everything that only existed because you were fragmented.

Self-recognition is the most intimate danger. But more than that—self-integration is social death. You must face what drift allowed you to avoid: your own absence, your own silence, your own complicity in the distance you have been blaming on the world. But you must also face what no one talks about: some relationships cannot survive your wholeness.

The warmth presses, asking whether you are ready to stop pretending the missing was someone else’s doing. But it is also asking something harder: Are you ready to grieve what you will lose when you stop being the person everyone needed you to be?

You resist. Of course you resist.

You tell yourself this is self-indulgence. The world is burning, people are dying, rights are evaporating, violence is policy, and you are sitting here feeling warmth in your chest like some kind of spiritual bypass. You tell yourself presence is privilege. You tell yourself vigilance is virtue. You tell yourself the drift is not abandonment but responsibility, not cowardice but care.

You tell yourself you cannot afford to be whole right now. Your people need you useful, not integrated. Your work needs you producing, not present. Your family needs you palatable, not truthful. Your lover needs you performing, not real.

But the warmth does not argue. It simply waits. And in its waiting, it asks the question you have been avoiding since the drift began:

Who benefits from your absence?

Two truths stand before you.

The inherited truth—that systems of power taught you to leave yourself for safety. That capitalism needs you fragmented to keep you producing. That white supremacy needs you monitoring yourself so thoroughly that surveillance becomes self-administered. That patriarchy needs you performing the acceptable version so the true version never threatens the order. That the medical-industrial complex needs you managing your body like a machine instead of inhabiting it like a home.

And the emerging truth—that you have continued leaving long after you had other options. That some part of you needs the drift now. Needs it to avoid facing what wholeness would demand. Needs it to maintain relationships that cannot survive your presence. Needs it to avoid the unbearable responsibility of being fully alive in a dying world.

Neither is the whole story. But only one leads you home.

You think of your elders, how their vigilance kept them alive in conditions designed to kill them. You think of the children who learned to split themselves to survive childhood. You think of everyone whose bodies became sites of surveillance, who learned that survival meant constant monitoring, constant performance, constant proof of manageability.

But you also think of the ones who crossed. The ones who chose wholeness knowing it would cost them everything. The ones who lost families, lost work, lost entire communities when they refused to keep performing. The ones who discovered that some forms of belonging are incompatible with being real.

The threshold does not ask you to dishonor the inheritance. It asks you to recognize when survival strategy has become suicide method. When the vigilance meant to protect you has become the thing killing you most slowly.

The threshold is crossed not by force, but by consent. And consent here means grief. Real grief. Not the clearing-space-for-authenticity version. Not the “they-weren’t-meant-for-you” comfort. But actual mourning for what you are about to lose.

Because you will lose things. People who cannot love the whole you. Work that cannot accommodate your presence. Identities that only existed in performance. A version of yourself that people learned to rely on. Safety that came from staying small.

The warmth waits for your consent. Not to make you whole. To let you become whole. And becoming means destroying.

You lean into the warmth the way you lean toward a voice calling your name in the dark—uncertain but willing, afraid but choosing anyway. You let the heat move through you. You let your breath follow it. You let your awareness drop into your body instead of hovering above it, watching, calculating, managing, performing.

Your hands shake. Your throat closes. The warmth builds until you think you might split open from the pressure of your own presence.

You are not fully across. Not yet.

But you are no longer facing outward. You are no longer waiting at the door.

The threshold has recognized you. And in recognizing you, it has shown you the price: everything you built while broken will have to be rebuilt or released.

This is not a promise. It is a warning.

The question is whether you will pay it.

---

The Return

Return begins when you stop treating the threshold as a boundary and start treating it as a funeral.

The warmth at your sternum—once a tremor, then a terror—becomes a place to stand. But standing here means witnessing what burns. You cross not by moving forward, but by letting everything behind you collapse.

The room is not unfamiliar. It holds the outlines of choices you postponed, instincts you muted, joys you sidelined in the name of survival. Nothing here is new; nothing is lost. But everything is different now because you are here to see it. And seeing means reckoning.

Return is not a single moment. It is a practice you learn slowly, failing more often than you succeed, breaking more than you repair, until the muscle memory of presence begins to replace the reflex of drift.

You learn to check in with the warmth throughout the day.
Is this choice bringing me closer or pulling me away?
Are you speaking from center or from performance?
Is this intimacy or management?

The answers are devastating.

You discover how much of your life you built around the drift. The friendships that only worked because you never fully showed up—when you start showing up, they end. Not dramatically. Just a slow fade. Texts that go unanswered. Invitations that stop coming. A mutual recognition that what you had only existed because of what you withheld.

You grieve them. Actually grieve them. Not the “clearing space for better people” narrative. Real loss. These were people you loved. People who loved some version of you. But the version they loved is dying, and they cannot love what is being born.

The professional persona you perfected to avoid being seen—you watch it crack in meetings. You start saying no to projects that need your absence. You stop performing expertise you do not feel. Your productivity drops. Your value, as the system measures it, declines. Some doors close. You have to recalculate what kind of work your whole self can do, and the answer is: less work that matters more.

The political work you used as cover for not doing the work of being whole—you have to renegotiate your relationship to urgency. The crisis is real. The need is real. But you are no longer willing to martyr yourself to movements that demand your fragmentation as proof of commitment. You learn to distinguish between solidarity and self-abandonment. Some comrades understand. Some call you selfish. Both are true.

The family dynamics built around your acceptable performance—you disrupt them by being present. You stop absorbing their discomfort. You stop managing their feelings about you. You speak truths they needed you not to speak. Some relationships deepen. Others fracture. You discover that some family members only knew how to love the drifted version of you. Your wholeness registers as betrayal.

The love you built while absent—this one nearly destroys you.

You try to bring your whole self to the relationship. You try to stop performing. You try to be there, really there, in the way you have never been before. And you watch them pull away. Not because they do not love you, but because they fell in love with your absence. Your distance was safety for them. Your performance was comfort. The real you—the present, whole, no-longer-drifting you—is someone they do not recognize and cannot accommodate.

You fight for it. You try to explain. You go to therapy together. You have the same conversation seventeen different ways. But some loves are architectural, built on specific shapes, and when you change shape, the structure collapses.

You have to let it go.

And the grief is not clean. It is not the “this wasn’t meant for me” kind. It is the “this was beautiful and real and now it is over because I chose myself” kind. It is the knowledge that you could have stayed if you had been willing to keep performing. That the relationship was not wrong—it was simply incompatible with your wholeness.

You lose people. You disappoint people. You become legible as selfish to people who needed your selflessness to survive.

Belonging begins not with recognition, but with presence. And presence costs everything you built in absence.

But here is what they do not tell you: some of what you lose should be lost. Some of what breaks should break. Not because it was bad, but because it only worked when you were not fully there.

Your feelings arrive—grief first, dignified and heavy; regret beside it, quiet but clear. Rage shows up uninvited, furious at all the years you spent performing. Shame lingers at the threshold, whispering that you should have chosen yourself sooner, that you should have known better, that you should have been braver. You let them all remain. You bow to none of them.

Belonging is not comfort. Belonging is capacity: the capacity to stay where you once escaped, to feel without fleeing, to reclaim without apology, to grieve without letting grief become a reason to return to drift.

Your body adjusts. The chronic tension in your shoulders begins to release. Your sleep changes—sometimes deeper, sometimes fitful with dreams of everything you are losing. You notice pleasure without the old reflex to monitor whether you are performing it correctly. But you also notice new terrors: the vulnerability of being seen, the exposure of being known, the unbearable responsibility of taking up space.

Your work changes. The writing that used to flow from a place of distant analysis now demands something rawer. You can no longer hide behind theory or perform insight you have not earned through lived reckoning. Some readers sense the shift and are moved. Others are uncomfortable. They liked you better when you were analyzing systems from outside them, when you were a voice of reason instead of a body in pain. You lose subscribers. You write anyway.

The distance dissolves—not dramatically, but naturally, like shadow receding from steady light. And in its place: presence. Terrifying, costly, unsustainable presence.

You do not yet know if you are trading certain belonging for uncertain solitude.

But you are standing where your life can find you. And that will have to be enough.

---

The Inheritance

Inheritance arrives quietly, the way morning light touches a room before you are fully awake. It is not something handed to you. It is something revealed once you stop treating your own presence as negotiable.

This is the inheritance: the capacity to choose yourself even when choosing yourself costs you everything.

The warmth at your sternum, once a terror, now holds as a climate. Not constant—you still drift, you still perform, you still catch yourself managing instead of being. But now you know the difference. Now you can feel when you leave. And you can choose to return.

Every choice ripples forward. The way you speak to your own fear. The way you refuse to silence your instincts. The way you stay when staying is the harder thing. The way you leave when leaving is the truth.

These become the architecture of the future self you are building.

December 2025 closes like a fist around the throat of the country. The first year of organized cruelty. The policies have calcified. The violence has routine. Your people are exhausted from performing resilience. Everyone is calculating how much of themselves they can abandon and still call it living.

You understand the calculation. You lived it for decades.

But you also know, now, what wholeness actually is—not healing. Wholeness is rupture. It breaks what was built on your brokenness. It costs you relationships, opportunities, identities, safety. It demands you grieve not just what was taken from you, but what you must release to become yourself.

People sense the shift before they understand it. A steadier voice. A clearer boundary. A willingness to disappoint. They may call it growth. They may call it selfishness. Both are true.

The lamp still burns, but it no longer marks absence. It marks the cost of presence—the devotion required to remain in your own life when remaining means losing what you built while gone.

Drift will come again. For all of us, it does. The inherited vigilance does not vanish because you name it. The systems that demand your fragmentation do not stop operating because you refuse to cooperate. Capitalism still needs you absent enough to exploit. White supremacy still needs you monitoring yourself. Patriarchy still needs you performing. Digital platforms still need you curating your pain into content.

The world will still find a thousand ways to ask you to leave yourself.

But now you know the warmth. You know the threshold. You know the cost. You know what you lose when you cross, and what you lose if you don’t.

You were never waiting for someone who failed to arrive. You were waiting for the moment you would stop failing to arrive for yourself, even knowing that arriving means losing people, losing safety, losing the version of belonging that only worked because you were not fully there.

The distance was never ours. But the return is. And so is everything it destroys. And so is everything it might build. And so is the grief of not knowing which will matter more.

Let that be enough—for now.

---

Author’s Note

This piece began in December 2025, over a year into performing resilience, when I realized I had been using the crisis as permission to delay a reckoning I knew was coming: the drift I learned as survival had become the thing killing me most slowly.

I kept calling the ache something outward—kept waiting for conditions to improve enough that I could afford to be whole—because it felt easier than admitting the truth: some of what I built only worked because I was not fully there. And becoming whole would mean losing it.

Writing this fable meant naming what no one wants to say about return: it is not just beautiful. It is not just coming home. It is also grief.

If this piece found you, it is because some part of you already knows what crossing costs. We all drift. We all build lives around our absence. We all keep lamps lit for versions of ourselves we hope will return. But we rarely talk about what happens when they do—what we lose, who we disappoint, what breaks that cannot be repaired.

My hope is that this fable gives language to the grief of choosing yourself. Not the sanitized version where everything works out, but the real version where wholeness costs you people you love, work you value, safety you need. Where the only honest answer to “was it worth it” is something closer to: I don’t know yet. Ask me in a year.

The distance was never ours to keep. But neither is what we lose when we cross. Both belong to the inheritance now.

---

UNSPUN publishes longform essays, op-eds, and visual documents tracing the language of power in real time.
This piece appears in UNSPUN, the publication’s central body of work interrogating truth, language, and the systems that shape both.

To engage or contribute, write to taylorallynofficial@gmail.com, or follow UNSPUN for new releases and ongoing dialogues.

If something in this piece stirred you, that stirring is the point. Subscribe below to keep listening for what language can still heal.

---

Every word here is researched, written, and sharpened by one person—me. If you value work that names what others won’t, consider becoming a paid subscriber. It keeps this space independent, and it keeps pieces like this possible.